<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>CALSEIA // California Solar Energy Industries Association</title>
	<atom:link href="http://calseia.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://calseia.org</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:03:57 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>County of Alameda Needs Input to Launch Regional Renewable Energy Procurement Initiative</title>
		<link>http://calseia.org/county-of-alameda-needs-input-to-launch-regional-renewable-energy-procurement-initiative/</link>
		<comments>http://calseia.org/county-of-alameda-needs-input-to-launch-regional-renewable-energy-procurement-initiative/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Jun 2013 19:03:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kjones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calseia.org/?p=2082</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The County of Alameda and 18 other agencies in San Mateo, Contra Costa and Santa Clara Counties have come together to launch the Regional Renewable Energy Procurement (R-REP) initiative, the goal of which is to deploy a significant number of renewable energy (primarily solar) projects across municipal high-potential sites that are economically beneficial, reduce transaction [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The County of Alameda and 18 other agencies in San Mateo, Contra Costa and Santa Clara Counties have come together to launch the Regional Renewable Energy Procurement (R-REP) initiative, the goal of which is to deploy a significant number of renewable energy (primarily solar) projects across municipal high-potential sites that are economically beneficial, reduce transaction costs, and yield regional environmental benefits.</p>
<p>The County of Alameda is currently conducting a Request for Information (RFI) and would like widespread participation from the solar industry. Your completion of the RFI will enable the County to plan appropriately for the RFP phase of this project and to incorporate solar industry feedback into the documents that will be issued.</p>
<p>To learn more about the RFI, please visit the County of Alameda website here: <a href="http://www.acgov.org/gsa_app/gsa/purchasing/bid_content/contractingdetail.jsp?BID_ID=1393">http://www.acgov.org/gsa_app/gsa/purchasing/bid_content/contractingdetail.jsp?BID_ID=1393</a>.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>The PDF found at this site contains a link to the online RFI questionnaire, <b>which must be submitted online by 2:00 p.m. on June 24, 2013.</b></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calseia.org/county-of-alameda-needs-input-to-launch-regional-renewable-energy-procurement-initiative/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Perez Advances New Statewide Energy Procurement Policy</title>
		<link>http://calseia.org/perez-advances-new-statewide-energy-procurement-policy/</link>
		<comments>http://calseia.org/perez-advances-new-statewide-energy-procurement-policy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Jun 2013 19:11:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kjones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calseia.org/?p=2072</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Amendments to AB 177 call for half of the state’s energy to come from renewable sources (SACRAMENTO) – Today, Assemblyman V. Manuel Pérez put forth a legislative proposal for a new coordinated approach to state energy procurement that emphasizes affordability and reliability, while helping the state meet its greenhouse gas emission goals and improve air [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<h4><i>Amendments to AB 177 call for half of the state’s energy to come from renewable sources</i></h4>
<p>(SACRAMENTO) – Today, Assemblyman V. Manuel Pérez put forth a legislative proposal for a new coordinated approach to state energy procurement that emphasizes affordability and reliability, while helping the state meet its greenhouse gas emission goals and improve air quality through the enhanced use of renewable energy.</p>
<p>“Currently energy procurement in California is guided by multiple policies that have disconnected goals related to greenhouse gas emission reductions, environmental protection, and the economy,” explained Pérez.  “The state needs a clear, unified policy that coordinates these goals, while addressing the real system needs of affordability and reliability.”</p>
<p>Amendments made yesterday to AB 177 clarify that the 33% by 2020 current Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) is intended to be a floor, not a ceiling, for energy procurement.  It directs all retail sellers of electricity to adopt a long-term procurement strategy to achieve a target of procuring 51% of their electricity from renewable resources by December 31, 2030.  It further sets in statute the longer-term target of reducing emissions of greenhouse gases by 80% below 1990 levels by 2050, a policy already adopted by the State Air Resources Board.  The bill also incorporates the current loading order policy adopted by the California Energy Commission, the California Public Utilities Commission, and the Legislature, which requires all cost effective energy efficiency, demand response, and renewables available be procured to meet system resource needs.</p>
<p>State policies adopted by the Legislature and through Executive Order to reduce fossil fuel dependence and expand renewable energy are reshaping California’s electricity system.  At the same time, the replacement and/or retirement of several Southern California power plants have created opportunities to think differently and modernize statewide energy procurement and resource planning.  Pérez sees this as an ideal time to advance the dialogue on this critical matter facing the state.</p>
<p>“I believe that AB 177 establishes the right framework to get this important conversation going,” continued Pérez, “and I look forward to working with our policy committees in the summer and fall to further refine this proposal.”</p>
<p>Pérez represents the 56th Assembly district, a region with an abundance of renewable resource potential.  He is the author of a series of bills to facilitate responsible renewable energy development that balances economic opportunity, environmental protection, and job creation.</p>
<p>To read the text of AB 177, please visit the state’s <a href="http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billSearchClient.xhtml">legislative information website</a>.</p>
<p><i> </i></p>
<p><i>Assemblymember V. Manuel Pérez (D-Coachella) serves as the Assistant Majority Floor Leader of the California State Assembly and as Vice Chair of the California Latino Legislative Caucus.  He represents the 56th district, which comprises the cities and communities of Blythe, Brawley, Bermuda Dunes, Calexico, Calipatria, Cathedral City, Coachella, Desert Hot Springs, El Centro, Holtville, Imperial, Indio, Mecca, Oasis, North Shore, Salton Sea, Thermal, Thousand Palms, and Westmorland.</i></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p>Contact: Amy L. Wilson</p>
<p><a href="tel:916-319-2056">916-319-2056</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calseia.org/perez-advances-new-statewide-energy-procurement-policy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CALSEIA files formal comments on CPUC Proposed Decision to Modify Decision 10-01-022</title>
		<link>http://calseia.org/calseia-files-formal-comments-on-cpuc-proposed-decision-to-modify-decision-10-01-022/</link>
		<comments>http://calseia.org/calseia-files-formal-comments-on-cpuc-proposed-decision-to-modify-decision-10-01-022/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2013 22:48:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kjones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Regulatory]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calseia.org/?p=1872</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Click here to see CALSEIA’s formal comments on CPUC President Peevey’s Proposed Decision to Modify Decision 10-01-022 and expand technologies incentivized under the California Solar Initiative Thermal Program. &#160;]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://gallery.mailchimp.com/a0487692bb2e2f280211c4298/files/CALSEIA_Opening_Comments_on_Solar_Thermal_PD_2_4_13_R12_11_005_modifying_10_01_022.pdf"><strong>Click here</strong></a> to see CALSEIA’s formal comments on CPUC President Peevey’s Proposed Decision to Modify Decision 10-01-022 and expand technologies incentivized under the California Solar Initiative Thermal Program.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calseia.org/calseia-files-formal-comments-on-cpuc-proposed-decision-to-modify-decision-10-01-022/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>2013 Legislative Calendar</title>
		<link>http://calseia.org/2013-legislative-calendar/</link>
		<comments>http://calseia.org/2013-legislative-calendar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Jan 2013 19:40:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kjones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Legislative]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calseia.org/?p=1774</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 2013 California Legislative Calendar can be viewed below: 2013 LEGISLATIVE CALENDAR]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The 2013 California Legislative Calendar can be viewed below:</p>
<p><a href="http://senate.ca.gov/sites/senate.ca.gov/files/2013FINALSenate.pdf"></p>
<h2>2013 LEGISLATIVE CALENDAR</h2>
<p></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calseia.org/2013-legislative-calendar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>National Solar Jobs Consensus 2012 &#8211; Great News for Solar &amp; Economy!</title>
		<link>http://calseia.org/national-solar-jobs-consensus-2012-great-news-for-solar-economy/</link>
		<comments>http://calseia.org/national-solar-jobs-consensus-2012-great-news-for-solar-economy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Nov 2012 19:11:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kjones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[economy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[job consensus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[market growth]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[solar report]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Solar Foundation]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calseia.org/?p=1708</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[On November 14th, 2012, The Solar Foundation released its third annual National Solar Jobs Census report, which found that the U.S. solar industry currently employs 119,016 Americans. This figure represents the addition of 13,872 new solar workers and a 13.2 percent employment growth rate over the past 12 months. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, employment in the overall economy grew [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On November 14th, 2012, The Solar Foundation released its third annual <em>National Solar Jobs Census</em> report, which found that <strong>the U.S. solar industry currently employs 119,016 American</strong>s. This figure represents the addition of <strong>13,872 new solar workers</strong> and a <strong>13.2 percent employment growth</strong> rate over the past 12 months. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, employment in the overall economy grew at a rate of 2.3 percent during the same period*, signifying that 1 in 230 jobs created nationally over the last year were created in the solar industry. The report, produced by The Solar Foundation and in partnership with BW Research and Cornell University, was released at the Interstate Renewable Energy Council&#8217;s Clean Energy Workforce Education Conference<strong> </strong>in Albany, NY<em>.</em></p>
<p>To read the full report, click <a href="http://thesolarfoundation.org/sites/thesolarfoundation.org/files/TSF%20Solar%20Jobs%20Census%202012%20Final.pdf" target="_blank">here</a> or read the report&#8217;s highlights below:</p>
<p>U.S. solar companies continue their trend of hiring faster than the overall economy, and remain optimistic about future growth. In fact, as of September 2012, the solar industry has grown to 119,016 solar workers—deﬁned as those workers who spend at least 50% of their time supporting solar-related activities. This is up over 13% from the 2011 revised ﬁgures. Over the next 12 months, nearly 45% of solar ﬁrms expect to add jobs, while fewer than 4% expect to cut workers, yielding a 17% growth in employment. This ﬁnding is especially relevant given that the overall employment in the entire U.S. economy is projected to grow by only 1.5% over the next 12 months.</p>
<p>There are 119,016 solar workers in the United States, up from a revised 105,145 in 2011. This represents an overall growth rate of 13.2% since August 2011, which is nearly six times higher than the national average employment growth rate of 2.3% over the same period. This comparison indicates that since the release of Census 2011, one in 230 new jobs were created in the solar industry.</p>
<ul>
<li>Eighty-six percent of the nearly 14,000 new solar workers added since August 2011 represent new jobs, rather than existing positions that have added solar responsibilities.</li>
<li>Installers added the most solar workers over the past year, more than offsetting declines in manufacturing. While this subsector is dominated by small ﬁrms, employment is growing most dramatically at larger ﬁrms, suggesting consolidation and maturation of the installation subsector.</li>
<li>Solar employment is expected to grow by 17.2% over the next 12 months, representing the addition of approximately 20,000 new solar workers. Forty-four percent of all solar ﬁrms expect to add solar employees during this period.</li>
<li>Employers from all of the solar industry subsectors examined in this study expect signiﬁcant employment growth over the next 12 months, with nearly all of them projecting percentage job growth in the double-digits.</li>
<li>Nearly half of installation ﬁrms expect to add solar workers in the next year, adding a total of nearly 12,000 jobs (a 21% growth rate year-over-year).</li>
<li>Approximately 90% of those who meet our deﬁnition of a “solar worker” (those workers who spend at least 50% of their time supporting solar-related activities) actually spent 100% of their time working on solar.</li>
<li>Over half of all ﬁrms (across all subsectors) generate 100% of their revenues exclusively from solar.</li>
<li>Employers are increasingly less likely to span multiple subsectors, suggesting that ﬁrms are beginning to specialize.</li>
</ul>
<p><em> </em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calseia.org/national-solar-jobs-consensus-2012-great-news-for-solar-economy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Net-Energy Metering Study</title>
		<link>http://calseia.org/net-energy-metering-study/</link>
		<comments>http://calseia.org/net-energy-metering-study/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 23:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kjones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CPUC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NEM]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[net-energy metering]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEIA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sierra Club]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[study]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calseia.org/?p=1706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CALSEIA joined Vote Solar, SEIA, and the Sierra Club in filing formal comments with the CPUC regarding the mandated study on net-metering’s cost-effectiveness and the value of on-site generation.  Our comments focus on the scope of issues to be studied and seek to ensure that the value of distributed solar is appropriately valued by ratepayers [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CALSEIA joined Vote Solar, SEIA, and the Sierra Club in filing formal comments with the CPUC regarding the mandated study on net-metering’s cost-effectiveness and the value of on-site generation.  Our comments focus on the scope of issues to be studied and seek to ensure that the value of distributed solar is appropriately valued by ratepayers and the utilities.</p>
<h4>Click <a href="http://calseia.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=a0487692bb2e2f280211c4298&amp;id=911aba6947&amp;e=aa6af8ab43">here</a> to read the formal comments.</h4>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calseia.org/net-energy-metering-study/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CAL/OSHA and Rooftop Safety</title>
		<link>http://calseia.org/calosha-and-rooftop-safety/</link>
		<comments>http://calseia.org/calosha-and-rooftop-safety/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 23:33:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kjones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[cal/osha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[installers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[regulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[rooftop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[safety]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calseia.org/?p=1701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CALSEIA formally submitted a petition to CAL/OSHA to amend fall protection and skylight requirements for residential and commercial rooftop installations.  The petition asks CAL/OSHA to consider safety innovations regarding skylights and rooftop work done by solar installers that currently meet the intent, but not yet the letter, of the regulations. If adopted by CAL/OSHA, it [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CALSEIA formally submitted a petition to CAL/OSHA to amend fall protection and skylight requirements for residential and commercial rooftop installations.  The petition asks CAL/OSHA to consider safety innovations regarding skylights and rooftop work done by solar installers that currently meet the intent, but not yet the letter, of the regulations. If adopted by CAL/OSHA, it will be easier and safer for rooftop installers to comply with state rooftop safety regulations.  This would benefit all rooftop solar installers and was a key recommendation of CALSEIA’s Safety Committee. CALSEIA owes a special thanks to Solar City for providing us with the funds to hire a lobbyist that specializes in CAL/OSHA issues. The lobbyist will report to CALSEIA&#8217;s Executive Director, Bryan Crabb.</p>
<h4><a href="http://calseia.us4.list-manage1.com/track/click?u=a0487692bb2e2f280211c4298&amp;id=bfca14d62f&amp;e=aa6af8ab43">Read the Petition</a></h4>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calseia.org/calosha-and-rooftop-safety/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>CSI Guideline Revisions</title>
		<link>http://calseia.org/csi-guideline-revisions/</link>
		<comments>http://calseia.org/csi-guideline-revisions/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 23:28:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kjones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CEC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSI]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[CSI Guidbook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[monitoring]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[performance monitoring]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calseia.org/?p=1691</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The CEC hosted a workshop on revisions to the CSI Guidebook. CALSEIA will work with its membership to address issues associated with performance monitoring requirements for smaller systems whereby these costly requirements negate the CSI rebate.  Formal comments are due on November 15th. Presentations and Program Administrators&#8217; Reccommendations]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The CEC hosted a workshop on revisions to the CSI Guidebook. CALSEIA will work with its membership to address issues associated with performance monitoring requirements for smaller systems whereby these costly requirements negate the CSI rebate.  Formal comments are due on November 15<sup>th</sup>.</p>
<h4><a href="http://calseia.us4.list-manage.com/track/click?u=a0487692bb2e2f280211c4298&amp;id=bd39d77521&amp;e=aa6af8ab43">Presentations and Program Administrators&#8217; Reccommendations</a></h4>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calseia.org/csi-guideline-revisions/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Southern California Edison&#8217;s Rooftop Program Report</title>
		<link>http://calseia.org/southern-california-edisons-rooftop-program-report/</link>
		<comments>http://calseia.org/southern-california-edisons-rooftop-program-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2012 23:21:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>kjones</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calseia.org/?p=1688</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) released a report documenting best practices on the utility-owned portion of the SCE Rooftop Program.  Although a lengthy report, there is interesting data with respect to development timelines and utility timeline-flows. See the report here]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Electric Power Research Institute (EPRI) released a report documenting best practices on the utility-owned portion of the SCE Rooftop Program.  Although a lengthy report, there is interesting data with respect to development timelines and utility timeline-flows.</p>
<h4>See the report <a href="http://gallery.mailchimp.com/a0487692bb2e2f280211c4298/files/EPRI_SCE_rooftop_PV_program.pdf" target="_blank">here</a></h4>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calseia.org/southern-california-edisons-rooftop-program-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Lease and PPA Disclosure Requirements</title>
		<link>http://calseia.org/lease-and-ppa-disclosure-requirements/</link>
		<comments>http://calseia.org/lease-and-ppa-disclosure-requirements/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Jan 2011 16:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Lease]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PPA Disclosure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Requirements]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://calseia.org/?p=538</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[CALSEIA receives inquiries from the public regarding leases and power purchase agreements (PPA). CALSEIA does not provide legal or tax advice – people should contact a legal or tax professional. Below are references to federal and state laws that may govern your specific lease or power purchase agreement. Note that the terms and conditions of [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>CALSEIA receives inquiries from the public regarding leases and power purchase agreements (PPA). CALSEIA does not provide legal or tax advice – people should contact a legal or tax professional. Below are references to federal and state laws that may govern your specific lease or power purchase agreement.</p>
<p>Note that the terms and conditions of leases or power purchase agreements may vary among the providers of these financial arrangements. Customers should become familiar with the terms and conditions of the agreements and ask questions if something is not clear. Any understanding you reach should be made in writing.</p>
<p>It is typical that the leasing or PPA company will retain ownership of the tax credits, depreciation value, rebates (if available), and environmental attributes of the solar system.</p>
<p>Remember to check the contractors’ license for all companies offering to perform work on your home: <a href="http://www.cslb.ca.gov">www.cslb.ca.gov</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Consumer Disclosure Requirements Affecting Solar Leases and Power Purchase Agreements</strong></p>
<p>The Consumer Leasing Act  requires meaningful and accurate disclosures of costs and terms to consumers so they may compare proposals to lease or finance personal property for their household use.  The State of California does not have its own Consumer Leasing Act , but California Public Utilities Code 2869 specifies consumer disclosures regarding solar leases and power purchase agreements (PPAs).</p>
<p><strong>Federal Consumer Leasing Act and Regulation M</strong></p>
<p>Regulation M, issued by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System, implements the Consumer Leasing Act (Act).  The Act and Regulation M apply to consumer (residential) leases if the leasing period is longer than four months and the lessee’s total contractual obligation (defined below) does not exceed $25,000, regardless of whether the lessee has the option of purchasing the personal property at the end of the lease term.<br />
The total contractual obligation is not based on the value of the leased property.  Instead, it is the sum of all lease payments plus all nonrefundable amounts the contract obligates the lessee to pay to the lessor.  Residual value amounts, purchase-option prices, and amounts collected by the lessor but paid to a third party (such as taxes) are not included in the calculation.</p>
<p>On July 21, 2011, the dollar amount specified as the exemption threshold from the Consumer Leasing Act increases from $25,000 to $50,000.   In addition, the exemption threshold will increase annually based on increases in the Consumer Price Index for Urban Wage Earners and Clerical Workers (CPI-W).  For example, if the CPI-W increases by $1,000 (as reported every June 1) the exemption threshold would increase by $1,000 on January 1 of the next year.</p>
<p>The Act and Regulation M do not apply to power purchase agreements or leases with non-residential customers (such as, agricultural, commercial, governmental, or industrial lessees).  They also do not apply to credit sales, in which the consumer will own the leased property at the end of the contract term after paying a nominal sum.</p>
<p><strong>Regulation M Disclosure Requirements</strong></p>
<p>When Regulation M applies, companies are required disclose all of the terms and costs of the deal they are offering.   Before signing a lease, the consumer must be given a written, dated statement disclosing what they would pay or may have to pay.   Customers must also be told about any upfront money they have to pay, such as a first monthly payment, a refundable security deposit, a last-month’s payment, a capitalized cost reduction (like a down payment), freight or destination charges, or state or local taxes.</p>
<p>Lessors must also inform their customers about how many lease payments would be made, how much each payment would be, when the payments would be due (including grace periods), and whether penalties would be imposed for late payment or default.  The written statement must show the total costs (that is, what the upfront, closeout, and during-the-lease-term payments would add up to).  The Consumer Leasing Act also limits the amount of “balloon” payments  owed by the customer at the end of the lease.</p>
<p>The leasing company must also disclose other requirements, such as whether the consumer must take out a certain type or amount of insurance. If the personal property has a warranty, the leasing company must inform the consumer what the warranty covers and for how long.  In addition, the consumer must be told who is responsible for providing warranty service.</p>
<p>At the end of the lease, the customer may have the option of returning the used equipment to the lessor or purchasing it.  Before signing the lease agreement, the customer must be told whether and how the leasing company will assess wear and tear and whether the customer might have to pay extra for excessive wear and tear.  (Wear-and-tear standards must be “reasonable.”). There is no provision specifying which party pays for building repairs when equipment is removed.</p>
<p>If the customer has a lease that allows the used property to be purchased at the end of the contract, the leasing company must provide in writing under what circumstances the customer may buy the property and what the cost will be.  “Lessors must disclose the purchase-option price as a sum certain or as a sum certain to be determined at a future date by reference to a readily available independent source. The reference should provide sufficient information so that the lessee will be able to determine the actual price when the option becomes available. Statements of a purchase price as the “negotiated price” or the “fair market value” do not comply with [Regulation M’s disclosure] requirements.”   Leasing companies must disclose whether they will charge an additional purchase-option fee to cover their costs of selling the leased equipment to the original lessee.</p>
<p><strong>State-Required Disclosures from Independent Solar Energy Producers</strong></p>
<p>Sections 2868 and 2869 of the Public Utilities Code mandate specific disclosures to residential customers, who lease solar equipment or purchase electricity from independent solar energy providers.  The law applies to all solar leasing companies, regardless of the lease term or total cost of the lease. It also applies to solar energy companies installing equipment on residential property through power purchase agreements (PPAs).  The following is a list of the required disclosures:</p>
<ul>
<li>Good faith estimates of the kilowatt-hours (kWh) to be delivered by the solar energy system and the price per kWh of that delivered solar electricity.</li>
<li>“Plain language” explanations of:</li>
</ul>
<ol>
<li>Terms under which the pricing would be calculated over the life of the contract,</li>
<li>Operation and maintenance responsibilities of the contract parties,</li>
<li>Contract provisions regulating disposition or transfer of the contract if ownership in the residence transfers,</li>
<li>Costs or potential costs associated with the disposition or transfer of the contract, and</li>
<li>Disposition of the solar energy system at the end of the contract term.</li>
</ol>
<p>The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC) may require independent solar energy producers to disclose other information to consumers or to the CPUC, itself, as a condition of receiving ratepayer-funded incentives. In addition, the CPUC can compel companies to provide copies of “all contracts for the sale of electricity … for use in a residential dwelling…”</p>
<p>This State law also requires independent solar energy producers to disclose existence of the residential lease or PPA to the County Recorder. Specifically, a “Notice of an Independent Solar Energy Producer Contract” must be filed within 30 days of signing the agreement against the title of the real property on which the electricity is generated and against the title of any adjacent real property on which the electricity will be used.  At a minimum, the filed notice must state:</p>
<p>“This real property is receiving part of its electric service from an independent solar energy producer that has retained ownership of a solar electric generation system that is located on the real property. The independent solar energy producer provides electric service to the current owner of this real property through a long-term contract for electric service.</p>
<p>The independent solar energy producer is required to provide a copy of the contract to a prospective buyer of the real property within ten (10) days of the receipt of a written request from the current owner of this real property.”</p>
<p>If the solar energy system is located on adjacent property, the notice must state instead:</p>
<p>“This real property is receiving part of its electric service from an independent solar energy producer that has retained ownership of a solar electric generation system that is located on an adjacent real property. The independent solar energy producer provides electric service to the current owner of this real property through a long-term contract for electric service. The independent solar energy producer is required to provide a copy of the contract to a prospective buyer of this real property within ten (10) days of the receipt of a written request from the current owner of this real property.”</p>
<p>Other information that must be disclosed to the County Recorder includes:</p>
<p>The address and assessor’s parcel number of the real property against which the notice is recorded.</p>
<ul>
<li>The name, address, and telephone number of the independent solar energy producer, and any other contact information deemed necessary by the independent solar energy producer.</li>
<li>A statement identifying whether the contract is a contract for the sale of electricity or for the lease of a solar energy system, and providing the dates on which the contract commences and terminates.</li>
<li>A plain language summary of the potential costs, consequences, and assignment of responsibilities, if any, that could result in the event the contract is terminated.</li>
</ul>
<p>The independent solar energy producer must also file another notice when the contract is voided, terminated, sold, assigned, or transferred or when it transfers its obligation under the contract or changes its contact information.</p>
<p>Once the contract is terminated, the independent solar energy producer must record a subsequent document with the County Recorder “extinguishing the Notice of an Independent Solar Energy Producer Contract from the title to the real property on which the electricity is generated, and from the title to any adjacent real property on which the electricity was used.”</p>
<p>Lastly, if the solar lessee or PPA customer is attempting to sell his or her house while the contract is still in effect, the independent solar energy producer must provide a copy of the existing contract to the prospective buyer upon written request by the lessee or customer.</p>
<p>References<br />
i   15 U.S.C. 1667-1667f, see <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/15/1667.shtml">http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/15/1667.shtml</a> et seq.<br />
ii  California Civil Code Section 2985.7 resembles Regulation M, but it only applies to vehicle leasing.<br />
iii See definition of “total contractual obligation” at <a href="http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&amp;sid=035fd7cea3f1594d3df0888bd5e6ec25&amp;rgn=div9&amp;view=text&amp;node=12:2.0.1.1.14.0.5.10.27&amp;idno=12">http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&amp;sid=035fd7cea3f1594d3df0888bd5e6ec25&amp;rgn=div9&amp;view=text&amp;node=12:2.0.1.1.14.0.5.10.27&amp;idno=12</a>.<br />
iv  The date when the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010, which amended this provision of the Consumer Leasing Act, becomes effective.<br />
v   Amendments to Regulation M, implementing the Dodd-Frank Act, are underway now.  See <a href="http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-31530.pdf">http://edocket.access.gpo.gov/2010/pdf/2010-31530.pdf</a>.<br />
vi  See definition of “credit sale” at <a href="http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode15/usc_sec_15_00001602----000-.html">http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/html/uscode15/usc_sec_15_00001602&#8212;-000-.html</a>.  These types of financial transactions are subject to disclosure requirements in Regulation Z, which implements other provisions of the federal Truth in Lending Act.  See disclosure requirements under Section 226.18(j) at <a href="http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&amp;sid=c9973866e7ab6aad1df3878281241496&amp;rgn=div8&amp;view=text&amp;node=12:3.0.1.1.7.3.8.2&amp;idno=12">http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&amp;sid=c9973866e7ab6aad1df3878281241496&amp;rgn=div8&amp;view=text&amp;node=12:3.0.1.1.7.3.8.2&amp;idno=12</a>.<br />
vii For more compliance details, see Supplement I to Part 213—Official Staff Commentary to Regulation M at <a href="http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&amp;sid=035fd7cea3f1594d3df0888bd5e6ec25&amp;rgn=div9&amp;view=text&amp;node=12:2.0.1.1.14.0.5.10.27&amp;idno=12">http://ecfr.gpoaccess.gov/cgi/t/text/text-idx?c=ecfr&amp;sid=035fd7cea3f1594d3df0888bd5e6ec25&amp;rgn=div9&amp;view=text&amp;node=12:2.0.1.1.14.0.5.10.27&amp;idno=12</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://calseia.org/lease-and-ppa-disclosure-requirements/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
